Mieux Donner

CeSIA_-_Carré-removebg-preview

Centre pour la Sécurité de l'IA

A non-profit working to promote and research AI safety, train future specialists, and prevent the risks arising from imminent AIs whose capabilities exceed those of humans.

représentation artistique d'une descente de gradient

Last updated: March 5, 2025

Threats posed by AI

The International AI Safety Report 2025 identifies numerous AI-related risks [1]. These include:

  • Helping to synthesise toxic molecules and create pathogens

  • AIs interfering with the results of their own evaluation

  • Autonomous replication and the appearance of bias and negative values

Leading AI experts such as Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio have warned of a major risk in the absence of strict security measures. [2]

How CeSIA prevents the threats

CeSIA funds three types of mission:

  • The training of future security specialists, through accredited university courses, bootcamps and workshops

  • Technical research into AI security and governance

  • Raising awareness among major players in France and the general public

The Centre pour la Sécurité de l’IA is a French non-profit research organisation that raises awareness of the risks arising from AI systems and advocates technically informed regulation. Their mission is to reduce present and future risks, whether they are systemic, the result of misuse, or arise from the operation of generative AI, which is currently opaque. CeSIA benefits from tax relief in France.

The impact of CeSIA

1, 5 Million
people sensitized
400
students trained
12
bootcamps

"The acceleration of generative AI developments, fueled by a competitive race and investments that increased by eight in one year to reach 25 billion dollars in 2023, forces us to look at the technological breakthroughs of the coming months and years. [...] Our mission: to provide technical insight into AI development trends, identify current risks and challenges, and anticipate future ones."

What has CeSIA achieved?

  • Since 2022: ML4Good
    CeSIA has organised 11 iterations of the ML4Good bootcamp and 6 iterations of the Turing Seminars in AI safety, training more than 500 people in total.

  • 2024, BELLS
    CeSIA has created BELLS, a benchmark aimed at evaluating systems for supervising large language models.

  • 2024, Communication to the general public
    In 2024, CeSIA raised awareness among around one million French people and several government institutions.

  • 2025, GRASP
    CeSIA is a major contributor to the Global Risk AI Safety and Preparedness database, which provides an exhaustive list of all known risks and existing research agendas to address them, facilitating regulatory and research work.
  • 2025, Code of Practice
    CeSIA took part in the recommendations on the Codes of Practice, which guide the implementation of the EU AI Act, the European regulation on AI.

Tax deductibility: Maximise the impact of your generosity

Tax deductions in France are currently only available for donations to four of our recommended charities: Against Malaria Foundation, Good Food Institute, Helen Keller International, and Centre pour la Sécurité de l’IA

If you are taxable in France, you will benefit from a tax reduction of 66% of the amount of your donation up to the limit of the tax due or 20% of your taxable income.

In practice, this means that if you were planning to donate €100, you can triple this amount to reach a donation of €300 that you will declare, with a real cost of only €102 after tax reduction. This allows you to multiply the impact of your donation without increasing your planned expenditure.

You can read our full article on tax relief in France for more information.

We are able to offer tax deductibility for this association and all the organisations we recommend through our partners, Effektiv Spenden. If your tax residence is in Switzerland, please make your donations via this link, so that you can receive your tax receipt at the end of the tax year.

We work with partners around the world and can offer tax deductibility in many countries. Please contact us if you would like to make a donation from another country and we will discuss the tax options available to you. If you would like to donate and do not require a tax receipt, you can make a donation via Mieux Donner regardless of your country!

FAQ

What are AI risks ?

The international report on the safety of advanced AI [1] distinguishes three main categories of risk:

  • Misuse risks: these are harms resulting from the intentional use of AI to cause harm. This category includes proven dangers such as mass disinformation, as well as potential catastrophic risks, such as the facilitated development of biological weapons.
  • Malfunctions : these risks concern the dangers resulting from a discrepancy between the expected operation of an AI system and its actual behaviour. In particular, they include the risk of loss of control of future advanced AI systems.

  • Systemic risks bring together various threats to society and the environment generated by AI. They include the unplanned destruction of jobs, the worsening of inequalities and the excessive consumption of resources.

In the case of AI, numerous studies document dangerous, unexpected or manipulative behaviours emerging from AI systems without their designers’ knowledge. The international report on AI safety shows that regulating this technology is essential if we want to protect ourselves from its risks.

Furthermore, the scientific approach is not limited to directly observing phenomena that have already occurred. It also relies on theoretical understanding and predictive modelling. In many scientific fields, from astrophysics to climatology, specialists accept robust models of events that have never been directly observed.

Scientific evidence of the risks associated with advanced AI is based on three pillars:

  1. Empirical evidence and precursor incidents: Numerous studies document dangerous, unexpected or manipulative behaviour emerging from AI systems without the knowledge of their designers.

  2. Validated theoretical frameworks: Formal computational and mathematical models demonstrate the plausibility of major risks, particularly those related to AI’s ability to develop emergent goals that diverge from their creators’ intentions.

  3. Expert consensus: The opinion of scientists, when it converges, is an important indicator. A large majority of researchersexpress concern about these risks.

For CeSIA, the prevention and mitigation of AI-related risks must be based on :

  • Appropriate international governance: According to CeSIA, the pace of development of the most transformative technology in human history should not be decided by companies competing to dominate the market, or by countries in geopolitical competition. It is therefore essential for governments to work together to assess the risks, guide the development and supervise the deployment and use of this technology, in the same way as they do for atomic risks.

  • A regulatory framework: According to CeSIA, it is essential to put in place appropriate legislative frameworks to govern the development, deployment and use of advanced AI systems. The European AI Act is a step in this direction.

  • Fundamental research: Even if AI were to be used for the exclusive benefit of the general interest, there is currently no theoretical framework or technical protocol to ensure that advanced AI systems will remain under our control and pursue objectives aligned with our interests.

 

We recommend charities that

Focus on final outcomes:

Charities that prioritise the final outcome of their action and not indicators of impact. When talking about impact, it is essential to focus on the desired final outcome, such as improved opportunities and quality of life, rather than focusing on intermediate outcomes such as the number of books distributed.

Measure their impact

It’s surprising how few charities measure their impact. Our top recommended charities  use scientific methods to evaluate the results of their actions, ensuring that their interventions produce the desired effects. 

Are cost-effective

They save or improve the most lives per euro donated to them. Eg) our top recommended global health charities can save a life for as little as 3,000 euros, our top climate charities can avoid one ton of carbon emissions for just 1 euro and our top animal welfare charities can spare thousands of animals from factory farming for the same price of saving one animal in a refuge. 

Are independently evaluated

All of our top charities are independently evaluated by world leading charity evaluators. See more information below.

We do NOT recommend charities based on their:

Location

A life is valuable whether it is based in France or the developing world. 

Tax deductibility

Our top recommended charities are all tax deductible in Switzerland, but not in France. This is because French tax law dictates that a charity must operate from France in order to be tax deductible. We always prioritise the impact of a charity over its tax deductible status.

Overhead costs

Some of our charities such as Against Malaria Foundation have very low overhead costs, and some such as Clean Air Task Force – have much higher overhead costs. To explain why we don’t take overhead costs into account in our recommendations, imagine two charities: 

  • Charity A spends 10,000 euros a month on it’s operations and saves 1 life
  • Charity B spends 20,000 euros a month on it’s operations and saves 6 lives

In the above examples Charity A saves 1 life for every 10,000 spent on it, whereas Charity B saves 1 life for every 3,300 euros spent on it. In this example – it’s clear to see that it’s not overhead costs that are important – but in fact the ratio of overhead costs to the desired impact. Research suggests that there is not much of a correlation at all between overhead and effectiveness.

Read more about impactful charities 

 

Our recommendations are based on the research of independent experts 

Finding the best aid organisations isn’t that easy. That’s why we work closely with experts who have been conducting extensive and in-depth research on the subject for many years. These experts are completely independent and work at the cutting edge of charity evaluation in their respective cause areas. They conduct rigorous tests on hundreds of charities to find out as precisely as possible how much good their programs achieve per euro spent. By comparing the cost effectiveness of so many charities, they are able to short list the most effective charities to donate to in order for your donations to have the biggest impact. 

The charity evaluators whose research we primarily rely on are:

GLOBAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT: GiveWell

GiveWell is the world’s leading research organisation that studies global health and development charities. 

‘We search for the charities that save or improve lives the most per dollar. Our goal is to produce the world’s top research on where to give. Free, for everyone. We recommend a small number of charities that do an incredible amount of good’ (GiveWell)

GiveWell was founded in 2007 by Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, two former hedge fund employees. They wanted to do as much good as possible with their donations and found that there was little solid information available on how to do this. GiveWell invests more than 40,000 hours of research each year and has raised more than €1 billion for high-impact charities, saving an estimated 150,000 lives.

ANIMAL WELFARE: EA Animal Welfare Funds 

The EA Animal Welfare Fund was rated as the top animal charity evaluator by GWWC’s ‘evaluating the evaluators project’ in 2024. They are therefore the primary charity evaluator we defer to in order to choose our top animal charities. We meet with them every few months to get up to date recommendations. They conduct thorough research into various animal welfare organisations to find those that help the most animals per dollar. 

CLIMATE CHANGE: Giving Green

Giving Green is a nonprofit organisation that spends thousands of hours each year reviewing studies and climate charities to find the most cost effective interventions to combat climate change. From this research, they publish their top recommendations each year. Their team is made up of climate scientists, economists and impact evaluation experts with decades of experience working at the intersection of evidence-based policy and the environment. We meet regularly with Giving Green to discuss our climate recommendations and run climate workshops in collaboration with eachother.

Other evaluators

Although we primarily defer to GiveWell, Giving Green and EA Animal Welfare Fund, we also read the research of other top charity evaluators including LongView Philanthropy, Founders Pledge and Animal Charity Evaluators to ensure we are not overly-reliant on any one source of research. When choosing our top charities we prefer organisations whose effectiveness is corroborated by multiple independent evaluators.

We process donations free of charge, which means we do not keep any of your donation for ourselves. However, the payment methods credit card, PayPal and SEPA direct debit incur fees from the payment services we work with. These fees are deducted from your donation. The amount is calculated as follows for donations within France:

  • Transfer : Free of charge within the SEPA payment area

  • Transfer via Donorbox: 2.55% + 0.25 €

  • Credit card : 2.95% + 0.25 € (for European cards)

  • PayPal : 3,15 % + 0,25 €

For donations of  > 1,000 euros, we recommend a free bank transfer. PayPal and credit cards are not recommended for large amounts due to the costs.

Fees would also be incurred for a direct donation to the respective organisations. We have already negotiated with all payment providers and received particularly favourable conditions for non-profit organisations. We have specially advantageous conversion fees compared to traditional bank.

We also finance ourselves through donations, but completely independently.

If you would like to discuss the best way to donate through us, please get in touch.

pictogramme représentant une puce informatique

On average, €200 donated to CeSIA raises awareness among 720 people [3].

Your donation is paid directly to the organisations you support, and only transaction costs apply. Mieux Donner does not deduct any amounts for its own operations.
🔒 Security Error: This donation form requires a secure HTTPS connection for your protection. Payment processing over HTTP is disabled for security reasons.

Other recommendations on safeguarding the future