Mieux Donner

New-incentives-logo-square-2-removebg-preview

New Incentives

Financial support for Nigerian families to vaccinate their children.

Au Nigéria, un jeune bébé est tenu par sa mère. Sa mère tient également un certificat de vacance de New Incentives.

Last updated: 1st November 2024

The ravages of under-vaccination

Lack of access to vaccines is one of the main causes of death today:

  • An estimated 1.5 million children die every year from vaccine-preventable diseases.

  • In Nigeria, 40% of under-five deaths are due to vaccine-preventable diseases [1].

Nigeria has one of the highest under-five mortality rates in the world. Low vaccination rates are one of the main reasons for this.

How New Incentives augments vaccination rates

Vaccination centres are often located a long way from the target families, and getting their children there takes time. New Incentives offers small financial incentives to compensate for the inconvenience of travelling. The financial incentives are sufficient to pay for transport, medication or food for the families. A randomised controlled trial [6] of the programme estimates that the New Incentives programme has :

  • More than doubled the percentage of infants aged between 12 and 16 months who were fully vaccinated

  • Increased by 136% the number of carers who knew how many vaccines a child should receive in the first year of life

  • A 62% increase in the number of measles vaccines given on time (it is important to receive vaccines on time, as this maximises protection against disease).

New Incentives also raises awareness of the benefits of vaccination, and ensures an adequate supply of vaccines by helping the government and other partners to identify and address limiting factors in the vaccine supply chain.

New Incentives' Impact

108 %
more full-coverage
4 Million
children enrolled
€20
per person

The evidence of impact is very strong and New Incentives provides high quality ongoing monitoring with over 100 tracking indicators to assess programme performance. Vaccination reduces child mortality from vaccine-preventable diseases by around 50% [5].

“Every 19 seconds, someone dies due to an illness that could have been avoided with a vaccine.” – New Incentives

GiveWell is the world’s leading evaluator of health charities. GiveWell spends over 50,000 hours of research each year reviewing hundreds of charities. To date, only four charities, including New Incentives, have met our exacting criteria.

For €100, enrol five children in Nigeria in New Incentives’ vaccination programme, potentially saving their lives [2]

Tax Deductibility: Maximise the impact of your generosity

Tax deductions in France are currently only available for donations to four of our recommended charities: Against Malaria Foundation, Good Food Institute, Helen Keller International, and Centre pour la Sécurité de l’IA

If you are taxable in France, you will benefit from a tax reduction of 66% of the amount of your donation up to the limit of the tax due or 20% of your taxable income.

In practice, this means that if you were planning to donate €100, you can triple this amount to reach a donation of €300 that you will declare, with a real cost of only €102 after tax reduction. This allows you to multiply the impact of your donation without increasing your planned expenditure.

You can read our full article on tax relief in France for more information.

We are able to offer tax deductibility for this association and all the organisations we recommend through our partners, Effektiv Spenden. If your tax residence is in Switzerland, please make your donations via this link, so that you can receive your tax receipt at the end of the tax year.

We work with partners around the world and can offer tax deductibility in many countries. Please contact us if you would like to make a donation from another country and we will discuss the tax options available to you. If you would like to donate and do not require a tax receipt, you can make a donation via Mieux Donner regardless of your country!

FAQs

Yes, according to various studies, internal motivation is not affected by the end of the programme, and is even positively affected by the programme. Beneficiaries continue to bring their children to the clinics at a higher rate, even though there is no longer any financial reward.

New Incentives has a number of partners in the various Nigerian states involved. They coordinate with these institutions to ensure a smooth transition from the programme to the responsibilities of the states.

 

We recommend charities that

Focus on final outcomes:

Charities that prioritise the final outcome of their action and not indicators of impact. When talking about impact, it is essential to focus on the desired final outcome, such as improved opportunities and quality of life, rather than focusing on intermediate outcomes such as the number of books distributed.

Measure their impact

It’s surprising how few charities measure their impact. Our top recommended charities  use scientific methods to evaluate the results of their actions, ensuring that their interventions produce the desired effects. 

Are cost-effective

They save or improve the most lives per euro donated to them. Eg) our top recommended global health charities can save a life for as little as 3,000 euros, our top climate charities can avoid one ton of carbon emissions for just 1 euro and our top animal welfare charities can spare thousands of animals from factory farming for the same price of saving one animal in a refuge. 

Are independently evaluated

All of our top charities are independently evaluated by world leading charity evaluators. See more information below.

We do NOT recommend charities based on their:

Location

A life is valuable whether it is based in France or the developing world. 

Tax deductibility

Our top recommended charities are all tax deductible in Switzerland, but not in France. This is because French tax law dictates that a charity must operate from France in order to be tax deductible. We always prioritise the impact of a charity over its tax deductible status.

Overhead costs

Some of our charities such as Against Malaria Foundation have very low overhead costs, and some such as Clean Air Task Force – have much higher overhead costs. To explain why we don’t take overhead costs into account in our recommendations, imagine two charities: 

  • Charity A spends 10,000 euros a month on it’s operations and saves 1 life
  • Charity B spends 20,000 euros a month on it’s operations and saves 6 lives

In the above examples Charity A saves 1 life for every 10,000 spent on it, whereas Charity B saves 1 life for every 3,300 euros spent on it. In this example – it’s clear to see that it’s not overhead costs that are important – but in fact the ratio of overhead costs to the desired impact. Research suggests that there is not much of a correlation at all between overhead and effectiveness.

Read more about impactful charities 

 

Our recommendations are based on the research of independent experts 

Finding the best aid organisations isn’t that easy. That’s why we work closely with experts who have been conducting extensive and in-depth research on the subject for many years. These experts are completely independent and work at the cutting edge of charity evaluation in their respective cause areas. They conduct rigorous tests on hundreds of charities to find out as precisely as possible how much good their programs achieve per euro spent. By comparing the cost effectiveness of so many charities, they are able to short list the most effective charities to donate to in order for your donations to have the biggest impact. 

The charity evaluators whose research we primarily rely on are:

GLOBAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT: GiveWell

GiveWell is the world’s leading research organisation that studies global health and development charities. 

‘We search for the charities that save or improve lives the most per dollar. Our goal is to produce the world’s top research on where to give. Free, for everyone. We recommend a small number of charities that do an incredible amount of good’ (GiveWell)

GiveWell was founded in 2007 by Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, two former hedge fund employees. They wanted to do as much good as possible with their donations and found that there was little solid information available on how to do this. GiveWell invests more than 40,000 hours of research each year and has raised more than €1 billion for high-impact charities, saving an estimated 150,000 lives.

ANIMAL WELFARE: EA Animal Welfare Funds 

The EA Animal Welfare Fund was rated as the top animal charity evaluator by GWWC’s ‘evaluating the evaluators project’ in 2024. They are therefore the primary charity evaluator we defer to in order to choose our top animal charities. We meet with them every few months to get up to date recommendations. They conduct thorough research into various animal welfare organisations to find those that help the most animals per dollar. 

CLIMATE CHANGE: Giving Green

Giving Green is a nonprofit organisation that spends thousands of hours each year reviewing studies and climate charities to find the most cost effective interventions to combat climate change. From this research, they publish their top recommendations each year. Their team is made up of climate scientists, economists and impact evaluation experts with decades of experience working at the intersection of evidence-based policy and the environment. We meet regularly with Giving Green to discuss our climate recommendations and run climate workshops in collaboration with eachother.

Other evaluators

Although we primarily defer to GiveWell, Giving Green and EA Animal Welfare Fund, we also read the research of other top charity evaluators including LongView Philanthropy, Founders Pledge and Animal Charity Evaluators to ensure we are not overly-reliant on any one source of research. When choosing our top charities we prefer organisations whose effectiveness is corroborated by multiple independent evaluators.

We process donations free of charge, which means we do not keep any of your donation for ourselves. However, the payment methods credit card, PayPal and SEPA direct debit incur fees from the payment services we work with. These fees are deducted from your donation. The amount is calculated as follows for donations within France:

  • Transfer : Free of charge within the SEPA payment area

  • Transfer via Donorbox: 2.55% + 0.25 €

  • Credit card : 2.95% + 0.25 € (for European cards)

  • PayPal : 3,15 % + 0,25 €

For donations of  > 1,000 euros, we recommend a free bank transfer. PayPal and credit cards are not recommended for large amounts due to the costs.

Fees would also be incurred for a direct donation to the respective organisations. We have already negotiated with all payment providers and received particularly favourable conditions for non-profit organisations. We have specially advantageous conversion fees compared to traditional bank.

We also finance ourselves through donations, but completely independently.

If you would like to discuss the best way to donate through us, please get in touch.

Your donation is paid directly to New incentives, and only transaction costs apply.

Mieux Donner does not charge any fees for its own operations.

🔒 Security Error: This donation form requires a secure HTTPS connection for your protection. Payment processing over HTTP is disabled for security reasons.

Other global health and development charities we recommend

Helen Keller International
Vitamin A deficiency causes blindness in 250,000 to 500,000 children, half of whom die within 12 months. Helen Keller Intl supports government programmes that provide high-dose vitamin A capsules to infants at risk.

Vitamin A supplementation has been shown to significantly reduce infant mortality by between 4% and 12%.
Against Malaria Foundation
More than 1,100 children die every day from malaria, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa. Against Malaria Foundation distributes insecticide-treated mosquito nets to people at risk. To date, it has delivered 250 million nets.

Between 2004 and 2019, the use of mosquito nets prevented around 816 million cases of malaria and saved around 4.8 millions lives.